![]() ![]() It said there were very small numbers of reports compared to the very large number of vaccine doses, and it also noted that the reports did not necessarily indicate causality. The official report claimed there were no new types of adverse events reported that had not been reported previously and no new signals. (Of course, it does not mention the fact that most doctors would not submit reports if they felt the adverse event was unrelated to the vaccine or because they did not want to make waves.) In short, the MOH admitted that for nearly a year Israel did not have a functioning adverse event reporting system akin to VAERS, despite having publicly claimed otherwise. (During the meeting, the woman in charge of the previous system says she has received thousands of reports and doesn’t know what to do with them.) There was another system in place for doctors to report side effects, but the report said the new system was designed to discover side-effects that were not reported to doctors. The official report states that the system was put into place (nearly a year after the start of the vaccine campaign) because the previous patient reporting system could not be validated and was not suitable for analysis. They presented their results to MOH officials in early June the official report was released to the public on August 2nd. The MOH tasked a team of medical researchers, headed by pediatric specialist Professor Mati Berkowitz, head of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology unit at Shamir Medical Center, to analyse the data from a new adverse event reporting system they instituted to coincide with the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines in children age 5-11.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |